| Microsoft
vs General Motors
Interesting
comentary from the internet....
[This one is changing based on good old oral tradition.
It's been around and around, and probably isn't true, but it is fun!]
At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates
reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated:
"If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would
all be driving twenty-five dollar cars that got 1000 miles to the gallon."
In response to Bill's comments, General Motors
issued a press release stating (by Mr Welch himself):
> If GM had developed technology like Microsoft,
we would all be
> driving cars with the following characteristics:
>
> 1. For no reason whatsoever your
car would crash twice a day.
>
> 2. Every time they re-painted the
lines on the road you would > have
to buy a new car.
>
> 3. Occasionally your car would
die on the freeway for no
> reason,
and you would just accept this, restart and drive on.
>
> 4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver
such as a left turn would
> cause your
car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which
> case you
would have to reinstall the engine.
>
> 5. Only one person at a time could
use the car, unless you bought
> "Car98"
or "CarNT." But then you would have to buy more seats.
>
> 6. Macintosh would make a car that
was powered by the sun,
> reliable,
five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but
> would only
run on five per cent of the roads.
>
> 7. The oil, water temperature and
alternator warning lights would
> be replaced
by a single "general car fault" warning light.
>
> 8. New seats would force everyone
to have the same size butt.
>
> 9. The airbag system would say
"Are you sure?" before going off.
>
> 10. Occasionally for no reason whatsoever,
your car would lock you
> out
and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted
> the
door handle, turned the key, and grab hold of the radio
> antenna.
>
> 11. GM would require all car buyers to
also purchase a deluxe set
> of
Rand McNally road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though
> they
neither needed nor wanted them. Attempting to delete
> this
option would immediately cause the car's performance to
> diminish
by 50% or more. Moreover, GM would become a target
> for
investigation by the Justice Department.
>
> 12. Everytime GM introduced a new model
car buyers would have to
> learn
how to drive all over again because none of the controls
> would
operate in the same manner as the old car.
>
> 13. You'd press the "start" button to
shut off the engine.
<<return>>
|